Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yau Lop Poon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Although the article is poorly sourced, the notability of the subject in question is consensually acknowledged. @pple complain 11:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yau Lop Poon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced BLP. All external links are blogs/personal sites, and all "references" are written works by the person detailed in the biography itself (WP:COI). Notability of the individual not established with verifiable and reliable third-party sources. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 06:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Suggest nominator read WP:BEFORE. Type 'Yau Lop Poon' into Google and there are tons of references on the web and in books. Meets WP:GNG. Article is a mess, but subject is notable. Bgwhite (talk) 08:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is probably an intimidating subject for AfD regulars since the main sourcing is obviously going to be non-English. Even limiting oneself to English sources demonstrates that this is a clearly notable individual, a long-time editor of major publications. I know that so-called blogs don't get much traction at AfD, but when somebody is TRANSLATING TWO-PART INTERVIEWS of the man into English, that should be a tipper. Runner-up in the 2010 EXCELLENCE IN OPINION WRITING AWARDS of the newspaper society of Hong Kong. I assume that Chinese-language sourcing is vast. Carrite (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. When nominating an article for deletion, one should also search for sources to check for notability, not just rely on what's cited in the article. In this case, per User:Carrite, some reliable English sources can be found. —Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 06:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.